Attentional Biases in Anxiety Disorders: A Cognitive Perspective

Authors

  • Shweta Jain* Lecturer, Indus Public School, Jind, Haryana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36676/ssjip.v1.i4.23

Keywords:

Anxiety disorders, Attentional biases, Cognitive perspective, Threat processing

Abstract

Attentional biases in anxiety disorders from a cognitive perspective, focusing on how selective attention processes contribute to the onset, maintenance, and exacerbation of anxiety symptoms. Attentional biases refer to the tendency for individuals with anxiety disorders to selectively attend to threatening or negative stimuli while ignoring neutral or positive information. This cognitive phenomenon plays a critical role in shaping cognitive processing styles, emotional reactivity, and behavioral responses in anxiety disorders. Cognitive theories propose that attentional biases arise from heightened sensitivity to threat cues and difficulties in disengaging attention from threat-related stimuli, processes mediated by interactions between bottom-up sensory inputs and top-down cognitive control mechanisms. Empirical research employing experimental paradigms such as the dot-probe task and emotional Stroop task consistently demonstrates that individuals with anxiety disorders exhibit faster reaction times and greater attentional engagement towards threat-related stimuli compared to non-anxious individuals. Neuroimaging studies further elucidate the neural underpinnings of attentional biases, implicating alterations in brain regions involved in threat detection, emotional regulation, and executive functions. Specifically, hyperactivity in the amygdala and disrupted connectivity with prefrontal cortical regions suggest compromised regulatory mechanisms that perpetuate attentional biases and contribute to heightened anxiety symptoms.

References

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1-24.

Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 955-960.

Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., ... & Pine, D. S. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68(11), 982-990.

Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1183-1192.

MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15-20.

Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167-195.

Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(9), 809-848.

Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2006). A comparison of attentional biases and memory biases in women with social phobia and major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(4), 616-623.

Williams, J. M., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 3-24.

Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24(1), 3-47.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2024

How to Cite

Jain, S. (2024). Attentional Biases in Anxiety Disorders: A Cognitive Perspective. Shodh Sagar Journal of Inspiration and Psychology, 1(4), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.36676/ssjip.v1.i4.23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.