The Role of Working Memory in Decision-Making Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/ssjip.v1.i4.21Keywords:
Working memory, Decision-making, Executive functions, Cognitive controlAbstract
The critical role of working memory in decision-making processes, exploring how the capacity and function of working memory influence cognitive processes underlying decision-making. Working memory, a limited-capacity system responsible for temporarily holding and manipulating information, plays a pivotal role in integrating incoming information, past experiences, and goals to facilitate decision-making. Cognitive psychology research has shown that individuals with greater working memory capacity often demonstrate enhanced abilities to consider multiple alternatives, weigh complex information, and foresee potential outcomes during decision-making tasks. Theoretical frameworks, such as dual-process theory and the adaptive decision-making model, highlight the interplay between working memory and executive functions in decision processes. Dual-process theory posits that decisions can be influenced by both intuitive, automatic processes and controlled, deliberative processes mediated by working memory. This framework suggests that working memory supports the deliberative processes involved in evaluating options, planning actions, and inhibiting impulsive responses, thereby optimizing decision outcomes. Empirical studies utilizing neuroimaging techniques, behavioral experiments, and computational modeling have provided insights into the neural mechanisms underlying working memory's role in decision-making. Neuroscientific evidence indicates that regions of the prefrontal cortex, particularly dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, play a crucial role in integrating working memory processes with emotional and motivational factors to guide decision outcomes. Furthermore, studies investigating individual differences in working memory capacity and decision-making competence underscore the predictive validity of working memory as a cognitive resource in real-world decision contexts.
References
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
Dosenbach, N. U., Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2008). A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(3), 99-105.
Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(10), 475-483.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160-166.
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). Constructive memory: The ghosts of past and future. Nature, 445(7123), 27.
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104-132.
Wang, M., Gamo, N. J., Yang, Y., Jin, L. E., Wang, X. J., Laubach, M., ... & Arnsten, A. F. (2011). Neuronal basis of age-related working memory decline. Nature, 476(7359), 210-213.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shodh Sagar Journal of Inspiration and Psychology
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.